Agricultural Season for two sub-climate zones in West
Africa
Downloaded from: http://www.fews.net/Pages/timelineview.aspx?gb=r1&tln=en&l=en
FAO (Food and Agricultural
Organization, a branch of the United Nations) came out recently with a report
called “Why Has Africa Become a Net Food Importer?” (Accessible at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/i2497e/i2497e00.pdf).
This report looks at how Africa went from being once a net food exporter
(before 1970) to a net food importer (starting in the 1970s). This has great
consequence on food security for the continent and thus an investigation into
the reasons for this shift is important to both policymakers and the general
population of Africa as a whole.
The report indicates that
population growth, low to stagnating agricultural productivity, policy
distortions, weak institutions, and poor infrastructure as the main causes for
the shift from food exporter to food importer. It also explains that countries
that are faring better economically (Nigeria, Gabon and Angola for example) are
capable of importing foods as they have revenue from other primary resources
(i.e. minerals and petrol) to pay for food imports. Most African countries,
however, despite what primary resources they possess are not faring as well (Mali,
Niger and Zambia to name a few). As a consequence these countries have lived
with chronic food insecurity for decades.
The picture is incomplete. No
mention is made of the role external actors had and have in contributing to making
Africa a net food importer and the tragic consequence of generating greater food
insecurity among the poorest of African nations. First off London, Paris and
Lisbon have kept strong trade relations with their former colonies, perpetuating
the retardation of trade between neighboring African countries. Tokyo,
Washington and Beijing have only exacerbated this in pursing their
self-interests in exploiting African natural resources. All this competition between
stronger economies to capture Africa’s natural resources makes intra-trade in
Africa abysmal. Since intra-trade is poor, the infrastructure and markets are
not there for food producers. Milk and cheese from Mauritanian herds is not
found in Guinea-Bissau and rice and fruits from Guinea-Bissauan mangroves and
orchards are not found in Mauritania.
Second, international lending
institutions like the World Bank and International Monetary Fund impose
policies that retard (if not block altogether) the efforts African governments make
in promoting local food production. Tariffs on food imports are contradictory
to the lending institutes’ aim at liberalizing African economies and subsidies
to local African producers are viewed as wasteful and often scrapped in order
for African nations to receive loans.
Third, since there are no subsidies to promote local food production and tariffs are not imposed on imports, North America and Western Europe dumps their cheap, subsidized food products on African markets (showing the hypocrisy of world economy … free markets in Africa but protectionism for North American and European farmers). Food products such as meat and milk products, cooking oils and cereals flood into African markets and as a consequence retard local food production. NGOs and their media sources do a decent job in reporting on this (see: http://www.irinnews.org/Report/96427/MAURITANIA-Foreign-subsidies-sour-domestic-milk-industry ), but overall the reporting of external forces contributing to Africa’s food insecurity are downplayed for local, national and regional factors.
The FAO report suggests two directions that
Africa could pursue to alleviate food insecurity and develop a better standard
of living. One is to reduce the trade deficit regarding food by finding ways to
reduce agricultural imports and boost local agricultural production and
exports. For most countries in Africa, the author of this blog sides with this
policy. How to do this in an economic environment where external forces both
explicitly and subtlety promote their own imports to Africa is difficult. The
other is to ignore the agricultural trade imbalance and find ways to increase
African exports of non-food or non-agricultural sectors (like services,
tourism, oil and mining, etc.). This external forces promoted for years and
what has created greater vulnerability to food insecurity for the poorer
nations of Africa.
In fairness, the second option (which this author
opposes in general) might be the only path to take for some African countries,
particularly when dramatic changes in climate are affecting food production. The
first option, however, should not be seen as an unrealistic goal. It is
possible and should be promoted in as many communities, countries and regions
as possible. Self-reliance, not greater vulnerability and dependability on the
global economy, is a direction Africa needs to take for greater food security.
No comments:
Post a Comment